Experiments

(This is one of the important post, which I have posted in science forums discussion)

Already I have explained, how matter not occupy space in the paper.  17/04/2012

Now I will explain about matter not occupying space with combination of my papers simple experiment and predictions.

( I have discussed these simple experiments in my paper. But I have not given the predictions separately in the paper.)

In below figures, it is assumed that in ‘Z’ region pure empty space has existed. ‘A’ and ‘B’ are solid (rocks) existed in ‘E’ and ‘F’ region.

Established science says that empty space has the property of allowing itself to occupy by matter.

Therefore, when we place ‘A’ solid in ‘Z’ region, defender of established science, says that ‘Z’ region’s empty space has occupied ‘A’ solid in it.

Hence they say empty space and ‘A’ solid both have existed in same Z region.

As per their argument, if empty space has existed in same Z region, then it must and should have “lets itself to be occupied by matter” property in it.

To test this, we try to put B solid in same Z region.

But it is not possible to put B solid in same Z region (where already A solid has existed).

This phenomena also will defend by defender of established science by following two statements.

“Space (Z region) is empty. When any thing we place in empty Z region, then it will be occupied space.”
“To place B solid in same Z region, first we have to displace the A solid from Z region.
When Z region will be unoccupied, then it will occupy B solid.”

By above statement defender of main stream science, differentiate space into

1) Occupied space
2) Unoccupied space.

In their view “occupied space” means ‘A’ solid existed Z region and they thinks in same Z region empty space also has existed.

If we accept ‘A’ solid region as occupied space and if empty space also has existed in same Z region then,

How can we say, space is empty ? Because ‘A’ solid is not empty.

Also, here we are not seeing space and matter as different existences. Here defender of established science is calling only one existence, with the name of “occupied space” and by name of ‘A’ solid.

It says that space and matter are both same existence and there is no difference in between them.

Secondly, when ‘B’ solid has not takes the place of same Z region, they defend this phenomenon as

“To place B solid in same Z region, first we have to displace the A solid from Z region.
When Z region will be unoccupied, then it will occupy B solid.”

Here we have to think that,if any entity has any property, then that property must and should remain with that entity, in all conditions.

When B solid not takes the place of Z region (after putting A solid in it), then also if we accept space till existed in Z region, it implies that Z region space does not contain any property.

It is how scientific that considering an existence without any property?

In this world, is it really possible to exist any entity without any property? (Think a bit)

It is not possible. If we consider anything as an existence then it must and should contain some property and that property should remain same in all conditions with that entity.

I have given perfect definition about an existence and differentiation of two existences.

Existence: Existence is a size or volume, which contain same average density.

Differentiation of existences: In a considered volume, if we see difference in average density, then they are separate existences.

According to this, it is not possible to say, space has existed in same Z region even after putting ‘A’ solid in it.

Because solids always have average density, greater than zero and the pure empty space has zero average density.

Greater than zero average density ≠ zero average density

Hence empty space (containing zero average density) will not exist in Z region after putting ‘A’ solid in it.

My first prediction also does not allow to say, space has existed in same Z region (even after putting ‘A’solid in it).

My first prediction say’s that,

“Resistance to movement of an existence is mainly depending on another existence density, which has existed in the direction of force or net force.”

(Resistance to a movement is mainly depending on differences in between two existences density.)

According to this prediction, if space has existed in Z region, then it (space) must not show any resistance for B solids movement into Z region.

Because space is nil density existence. Hence it contain nil resistance property for motion.

B solid faced a high resistance means empty space has not existed in Z region, (after putting A solid in it).

Therefore only ‘A’ solid has existed in Z region.

Existence of only A solid in Z region is indication of displacement of empty space from Z region (which was previously existed in Z region).

My second prediction is based on this natural phenomena, that says

“An existence speed will be greater than zero, if and only, if it is capable to displace another existence which has existed in the direction of force.”

(Every movement of an existence is depending on displacement of another existence.)

Speed greater than zero means motion.  ‘A’ solid moved into Z region means, it is capable to displace the empty space of Z region. Therefore it moved into Z region and empty space displaced to another region.

Mean while ‘B’ solid not entered into ‘Z’ region.Because it is incapable to displace ‘A’ solid, Which has previously existed in Z region.

{For perfect understanding, you can test this by putting ‘A’ solid on water of a container. When we place solid on the water, then the solid (more denser existence) enters into the container by displacing the water (less denser existence).

}

It clearly says that, movement of more denser existence will displace less denser existence.

Empty space has always zero average density. Therefore it can be easily displaced to another region.[u]Hence it is impossible to occupy it by any matter (or by more denser existence)

Always less denser existence displaced by movement of high denser existence.

In this universe a process is continuously running naturally. i.e.

Conversion of more denser existence, into less denser existence (That is matter converting into energy.). In stars we can see this process.

By this process more denser existence, displacing the less denser existence to another region. It is making space of universe more wider (Matter energy space all have it.

This is the main reason for expansion of space.

******************************

Dear readers,

Primary requirement for movement of more denser existence is empty space. In this universe movement is taking place means empty space has existed in this universe and if you do experiments, then a more denser existence takes less time to displace empty space; comparing to any other denser existence.

(Every movement must need empty space, for this, take a example.

Suppose assume your car is in between a big traffic jam. Then why it is not possible to move car in any direction? Although it has contain fuel as a energy or force and a trained driver.

Because empty space needed for any movement and it will be displaced by movement of more denser existence.But empty space has not existed in traffic jam for movement of car in any direction.)

This empty space has a specific size or volume and it has nil resistance property for a motion. Where matter also has it’s own volume or space.Therefore when we place matter in empty space it will not occupy the empty space. It will be displaced to other region.

Therefore matter does not occupy the space other than it.

©2012, All copyright reserved.

Creative Commons License

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s